The “Annals of the University ‘Constantin Brâncuși’ of Târgu-Jiu, Education Sciences Series” upholds a rigorous peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality research. We follow a double-blind review process, which means that both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous throughout the evaluation period. This practice is designed to maintain objectivity, fairness, and integrity in the assessment of submissions.

Submission and Review Steps:

1. Initial Manuscript Screening: Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes an initial assessment by the editorial team to verify that it aligns with the journal’s aims, scope, and submission guidelines.

2. Assignment to Reviewers: Once the manuscript passes the initial screening, it is assigned to at least two independent experts in the relevant field. The selection of reviewers is based on their expertise and experience in the subject matter of the manuscript.

3. Double-Blind Review Process: During the review process, the identities of both the authors and reviewers are kept confidential. Reviewers are provided with an anonymized version of the manuscript to ensure impartial evaluation.

4. Review Criteria: Reviewers are asked to evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, significance to the field of education sciences, and adherence to ethical standards. Reviewers provide constructive feedback and recommendations for improving the manuscript, suggesting one of the following outcomes:

   • Acceptance without changes
   • Acceptance with minor revisions
   • Major revisions required
   • Rejection

5. Revision and Final Decision: Authors may be required to revise their manuscripts based on reviewer comments. Revised submissions are reassessed by the editorial team, and if necessary, by the reviewers. The final decision on acceptance or rejection is made by the Editor-in-Chief, based on the reviewers’ recommendations and the quality of the revised manuscript.

6. Publication: Once a manuscript is accepted, it is prepared for publication according to the journal’s editorial standards. Authors are notified of the anticipated publication timeline and any further steps required.

Transparency and Quality Assurance

The double-blind review process is central to maintaining the quality and credibility of the journal. We aim to provide authors with timely feedback, typically within a few weeks of submission. Our goal is to ensure a fair, thorough, and transparent review process that enhances the quality of published research and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in education sciences.

For any questions about the review process or submission guidelines, please contact the editorial office.